RPT Decision: HIMO Licence Appeal (RIR/00FY/HMV/2011/003)
This is an Appeal against a decision by Nottingham City Council to refuse to vary a licence. The Midland Panel refused the Appellant’s application to vary the existing HMO licence.
This is an Appeal against a decision by Nottingham City Council to refuse to vary a licence. The Midland Panel refused the Appellant’s application to vary the existing HMO licence.
This case involves two sets of premises and is regarding HMO Licensing in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea. The London Panel determined that both properties constituted as a licensable HMO, and that the Respondents are to pay the Local Authority £500 in costs.
The case involves an Appeal against a decision by Brighton & Hove City Council to attach a condition to the grant of a licence. This condition relates to the installation of a wash hand basin in the rear bedroom on the first floor.
The Southern Panel confirmed the decision by Brighton & Hove City Council.
This case involves an Appeal against an Improvement Notice made by Stevenage Borough Council. The Improvement Notice in this case were served whilst the property was still in occupation. Shortly before the hearing of the appeal, the property became vacant. As a result of this , the Local Authority revoked the Improvement Notice. The Appeal was then treated as withdrawn.
This case involves an Appeal against an Improvement Notice made by Westminster City Council. The Improvement Notice included a Category 1 hazard of ‘Excess Heat’. The London Panel confirmed the Improvement Notice and the appeal dismissed.
This case is regarding an Appeal against an Improvement Notice made by Hastings Borough Council. The Hazard in the Improvement Notice was a Category 1 and relates to ‘falls between levels’.
The Southern Panel determined the case on papers alone and the Tribunal confirmed the Improvement Notice.