This case relates to an Appeal against an Improvement Notice and Prohibition Order issued by London Borough of Islington.The Prohibition Order related to a room that was too small for use as a dwelling because of restricted head height and the lack a stair rail.
This case relates to an six Appeals against four Improvement Notices and two Prohibition Notices issued by North Devon District Council.
This case relates to an Application for an appeal against an Improvement Notice, a Suspended Improvement Notice, a Suspended Prohibition Order and a charging notice issued by London Borough of Newham. The appeal was rejected for the reasons set out decision.
This case involves an Appeal against a Prohibition Order served by London Borough of Newham. The Prohibition Order related to six Category 1 hazards namely: fire, excess cold, electrical hazards, lighting, damp and mould growth and falls on stairs; and three Category 2 hazards, namely: personal hygiene, sanitation and drainage, food safety and structural collapse and falling elements. The appeal was dismissed.
This case involves an Appeal against a Prohibition Order served by London Borough of Newham. The London Panel had no jurisdiction to hear the Appeal because the Respondent Local Authority had since revoked the Prohibition Order.
This case involves an Appeal against a Prohibition Order served by London Borough of Tower Hamlets. The Prohibition Order related to Category 1 hazards such as Excess Cold, Damp and Mould and Electrical hazards. The London Panel quashed the Prohibition Order.
 |
 |
 |
